TOLL ROAD ENTERPRISE FUND of harris county, texas





Organization - The Harris County Toll Road Authority (the “Authority”) was created by Harris County, Texas, (the “County”) by order of Commissioners Court on September 13, 1983, with the Commissioners Court designated as the governing body and the operating board of the Authority.  The Authority is a department and fund of the County and is charged with overseeing the acquisition, construction, improvement, operation and maintenance of the County toll road facilities (the “Toll Road Project”).  The Commissioners Court has full oversight responsibility for the Authority, and the Toll Road Project is an integral part of the County’s financial statements.  Construction of the Hardy Toll Road and the Sam Houston Tollway and acquisition of the Jesse H. Jones Toll Bridge, now referred to as the “Sam Houston Ship Channel Bridge” (the “Toll Roads”) have been financed with a combination of unlimited tax and subordinate lien revenue bonds and senior lien revenue bonds.  When all of the debt service, as discussed in Note 8, has been paid or provided for in a trust fund, the Toll Roads will become a part of the State of Texas Highway System.

The County purchased the Sam Houston Ship Channel Bridge (the “Bridge”) on May 5, 1994.  The County issued $232,326,713 Toll Road Unlimited Tax and Subordinate Lien Revenue Bonds to pay the costs of acquiring the Bridge spanning the Houston Ship Channel from the Texas Turnpike Authority and to complete construction of a portion of Beltway 8 East approaching the Bridge.  In conjunction with the acquisition of the Bridge, the Texas Department of Transportation (“TxDOT”) agreed to fund the lesser of 50% or $90,000,000 of the Authority’s total construction costs eligible for Federal Aid reimbursement.  As of February 29, 2004, the Authority had been paid $86,221,447 by TxDOT.

During fiscal year 2001, the Authority began construction of the Westpark Tollway, which will allow traffic to flow from State Highway 6 at the western terminus of the project, eleven miles to the intersection of Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard at the eastern terminus of the project. The total estimated cost of the project is $326,000,000.

Implementation of New Standards - In the current year, the County implemented the following new standards:

The Government Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) has issued Statement No. 39 (“GASB 39”), Determining Whether Certain Organizations are Component Units.  GASB 39 requires state and local governments to report legally separate, tax exempt organizations as discrete component units if they meet the following criteria:


-        The economic resources raised and held by the affiliated organization almost entirely is for the benefit of the Authority.

-        The Authority is entitled to or has the ability to access the funds raised by the affiliated organization.

-        The funds held by the affiliated organization are material to the Authority’s financial statements.


Management of the Authority does not believe that the implementation of this standard has an  impact on the Authority’s financial statements.


Basis of Presentation and Measurement Focus- The accompanying basic financial statements have been prepared on the full accrual basis of accounting as prescribed by the GASB.  Full accrual accounting uses a flow of economic resources measurement focus.  Under this measurement focus, the Authority applies all GASB pronouncements as well as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) pronouncements issued on or before November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements.

The Authority presents its financial statements in accordance with GASB 34 guidance for governments engaged in business-type activities.  Accordingly, the basic financial statements and required supplementary information (“RSI”) of the Authority consist of Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), Statement of Net Assets, Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Change in Net Assets, Statement of Cash Flows, and Notes to the Financial Statements.

Enterprise Fund – The financial statements of the Authority are presented on the flow of economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting.   Revenues are recognized in the period earned.  The Authority’s operating revenues are derived from charges to users of the Toll Roads in the County.  When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the Authority’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources to the extent they are needed.

Expenses are recognized in the period incurred.  The Authority’s operating expenses consist primarily of direct charges attributable to the operations of the Authority, including depreciation.  Interest expense and other similar charges not directly related to the Authority’s operations are reported as non-operating expenses.

Deposits and Investments – Cash and cash equivalents include amounts in demand deposits as well as short-term investments with a maturity date of 90 days or less from date of purchase. All investments are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices as of the Authority’s fiscal year end, with the difference between the purchase price and market price being recorded as interest income.

State statutes authorize the Authority to invest in fully collateralized or insured time deposits, direct debt securities of the United States or its Agencies, investment grade commercial paper, money market mutual funds and fully collateralized repurchase agreements.  County policy requires that repurchase agreements must be purchased pursuant to a master repurchase agreement which specifies the rights and obligations of both parties and which requires that the securities involved in the transaction be held in a safekeeping account subject to the control and custody of the County.  The margin requirement for all repurchase agreements is that market value must be at least 101% of the purchase price.  Investments in repurchase agreements may be made only through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a bank domiciled in the state of Texas with which the County has signed a master repurchase agreement.

Restricted Assets – Certain assets of the Authority are required to be segregated under terms of various bond indentures.  These assets are legally restricted for certain purposes, including operations and maintenance, debt service and construction. The Authority purchased surety policies to satisfy certain reserve fund requirements.  During the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004, the Authority was in compliance with these covenants.

In the financial statements, restricted net assets are reported for amounts that are externally restricted by 1) creditors (eg. bond covenants), grantors, contributors, or laws and regulations of other governments or 2) law through constitutional provision or enabling legislation.

Capital Assets – Capital assets include land, buildings, equipment and infrastructure that are used in the Authority’s operations and benefit more than a single fiscal year.  Infrastructure assets are long-lived assets that are generally stationary in nature and can typically be preserved for a significantly greater number of years than other capital assets.  Infrastructure assets of the Authority include roads, bridges and right-of-way. 

Capital assets of the Authority are defined as assets with individual costs of $5,000 or more and estimated useful lives in excess of one year.  Exceptions to the $5,000 capitalization threshold are as follows:  all land is capitalized, regardless of historical cost; the threshold for capitalizing buildings is $100,000 and the threshold for infrastructure ranges from $25,000 to $250,000, depending on the asset.

All capital assets are stated at historical cost or estimated fair market value at the date of purchase.  Donated fixed assets are stated at their estimated fair market value on the date donated.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the asset ranging from 3 to 45 years.  Roads are depreciated over a 30-year useful life. Equipment is depreciated over 3 to 20 years, depending on the type.  Buildings are depreciated over 45 years.  Prior to fiscal year 2003, buildings were depreciated over 30 years. The change in estimated useful lives of building and equipment resulted from the County’s adoption of GASB 34. 

The Authority capitalizes, as a cost of its constructed property, the interest expense and certain other costs of bonds issued for construction purposes less the interest earned on the proceeds of those bonds from the date of the borrowing until the date the property is ready for use.  All interest expense, interest earnings and the amortization of related bond costs were capitalized until September 1987 when the first of four sections of the Toll Road was opened for operations.  Prior to fiscal year 2001, net interest and other bond costs have been capitalized based on the percentage of miles of the uncompleted sections to the total miles of the project. Since fiscal year 2001, interest had been capitalized based on the weighted average accumulated expenses multiplied by the weighted average interest rate. Such capitalization increased the total cost of assets constructed by the Toll Road Project by $764,043 during fiscal year 2004.

Contributions – Federal, State or other government contributions to the Toll Road project are recognized based on the project percentage of completion.

Deferred Charges - Deferred charges consist of bond issuance costs that are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the bonds.

Premiums (Discounts) on Bonds Payable - Premiums (discounts) on bonds payable are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the bonds.

Risk Management - The Authority’s risk-of-loss exposures include exposure to liability and accidental loss of real and personal property as well as human resources.  Toll Road operations involve a variety of high-risk activities including, but not limited to, cash collections, construction and maintenance activities.  The County’s Office of Risk Management is responsible for identifying, evaluating and managing the Authority’s risk in order to reduce the exposure from liability and accidental loss of property and human resources.  The Authority is treated as a County department by the County’s Risk Management Office and is assessed premiums and charges similar to those assessed to other County departments.

The Authority is covered by the Harris County workers’ compensation program.  The County is self-insured for workers’ compensation medical and indemnity payments.  Claims adjusting services are provided by a third-party administrative claims adjusting service.  Interfund premiums on workers’ compensation are determined by position class code, at actuarially determined rates.

The County has reinsurance coverage for excess workers’ compensation and employer’s liability.  The retention (deductible) for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 was $850,000 per occurrence.  No claims settled during the last three fiscal years have exceeded this coverage.

Through the County, the Authority provides medical, dental, vision and basic life and disability insurance to eligible employees and retirees.  The Authority pays the full cost of employee and retiree coverage and 50% of the cost of dependent premiums.  The disability insurance will pay up to 50% of an employee’s salary for two years with an employee option to extend the benefits period to age 65 and increase the percentage to 60%.

The Authority’s group insurance premiums, as well as employee payroll deductions for premiums for dependents and optional coverages, are paid into the County’s Risk Management Internal Service Fund, which in turn makes disbursements to contracted insurance providers based upon monthly enrollment and premium calculations.

Billings to the Authority for property insurance, professional liability insurance and crime and fidelity policies are handled through the County’s Risk Management Fund as are payments to the insurance carriers.  Claim payments made up to the deductible limit are expensed by the Authority when paid by the Risk Management Fund.  Payments for the Authority’s general, vehicle and property damage liability claims, for which the County is self-insured, are made through the Risk Management Fund and billed to the Authority.

Compensated Absences - Accumulated compensatory leave, vacation and sick leave are recorded as an expense and liability as the benefit accrues for the employee.

Employees accrue 9.75 days of sick leave per year.  Sick leave benefits are recognized as they are used by the employees.  Employees may accumulate up to 480 sick leave hours.  Unused sick leave benefits are not paid at termination.  Employees with more than one year of service accrue from two to four weeks of vacation per year, depending on years of service.  Unused vacation benefits lapse at calendar year end and upon termination except for exempt employees who may convert such benefits to compensatory time, subject to the 240-hour maximum.  A liability for vacation earned, but not taken, has been recorded.

Nonexempt employees earn compensatory time at one-and-a-half times their full pay times the excess of 40 hours worked. The compensatory time balance for nonexempt employees may not exceed 240 hours.  Hours in excess of the 240-hour maximum must be paid to the nonexempt employee at the rate of one-and-a-half times the regular rate.  Upon termination, compensatory time is calculated at the current rate of pay.  Exempt employees earn compensatory time at one times their full pay times the excess of 40 hours worked.  Exempt employees can accumulate up to 240 hours of compensatory time.  Upon termination, exempt employees are paid one-half of the compensatory time earned at the current wage rate.  Compensatory time is carried forward indefinitely.  Accordingly, a liability for compensatory time earned has been recorded.

Statements of Cash Flows - All highly liquid investments (including restricted assets) with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.

Bond Refunding Losses - The difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of refunded debt is deferred and amortized in a manner that is systematic and rational over the remaining life of the old or new debt, whichever is shorter.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.


The carrying amount of the Authority’s deposits was $5,313,713 as of February 29, 2004.   The bank balances as of February 29, 2004 was $1,690 and was covered by federal depository insurance or collateralized with securities held by the County’s agent in the County’s name.

At fiscal year end, investments consisted of U.S. government securities, commercial paper, municipal bonds and money market mutual funds.  The investments are categorized to give an indication of level of risk, with Category 1 being the lowest risk and Category 3 the highest risk.  The credit risks are as follows:  (1) insured or registered, or securities held by the Authority’s agent in the Authority’s name; (2) uninsured or unregistered, with securities held in the trust department of the Authority’s counterparty in the Authority’s name; or (3) uninsured or unregistered, with securities held at the Federal Reserve or other third party in the account of the Authority’s counterparty.

The Authority’s investments including cash equivalents were categorized by risk level for fiscal year ended February 29, 2004 as follows:

3.          RECEIVABLES

Receivables at February 29, 2004, consist of the following:


Other assets as of February 29, 2004 are comprised of the following:

Advance payments were given to TxDOT for the Authority’s funding participation for these projects. These advances are amortized and transferred to construction in progress based on the project percentage of completion.

EZ tags are recorded as inventory based on the number of tags as of February 29, 2004 multiplied by the weighted average unit price per tag.


On December 17, 2002, the Commissioners Court authorized a tri-party agreement among Harris County, TxDOT and Federal Highway Administration to participate in the reconstruction of IH10 Katy Freeway. Under this agreement, the Authority will provide funding in the amount of $237.5 million, net of $12.5 million credit for design, construction, operation and maintenance of a Toll Facility. The Authority’s financial commitment will span nine payments over a five-year period. The first installment payment of $37.5 million was paid to TxDOT in May 2003. The payments pay for the license to the real property within the limits of and for the right to operate the Toll Facility. Toll Revenues from the operation of the Toll Facility will be collected by the Authority until the County is paid in full. The Toll Facility will revert to the State when the County has been fully paid the reimbursement from revenue or upon payment by the State to the County of an amount equal to the difference between the total amount of the reimbursement and the actual amount paid to the County as of the date of such reversion. The Toll Facility may revert to the State at any time after such full payment, subject to the State giving the County 90 days’ prior written notice.


        Capital asset activity for the year ended February 29, 2004 was as follows:                                                           


Construction in progress as of February 29, 2004 totaled $345,159,434. The major projects are described in the following paragraphs:

Construction of the Westpark Tollway, which will allow traffic to travel from State Highway 6 through the intersection of Richmond Avenue and Post Oak Boulevard, began in fiscal year 2001. The capitalized costs for the project include engineering, design fees and capitalized interest. Capitalized cost related to the Westpark Tollway was  $97,663,937 as of February 29, 2004.

The Authority began several construction projects during the prior years. These projects are Hardy Extension, Barker Cypress, Ft Bend Tollway, Beltway 8 Tollway, construction of additional lane capacity for Sam Houston, Riley Fuzzel Road, Pavement repair from Greens Road to FM1960, SH249 Direct Connector, and Westpark Center renovation. During the fiscal year 2004, the Authority began several projects. These projects are Fort Bend Parkway Extension, IH10 managed lanes, SH288 Brazoria, Airport connector enhancement, Ship Channel Bridge plaza, and Fellows Road overpass. The capitalized costs for the projects include engineering, design fees and capitalized interest. As of February 29, 2004 the following are life-to-date capitalized project costs:



The County entered into several agreement with TxDOT to construct a direct connector between Eastbound Beltway 8 and Northbound Hardy Toll Road, a direct connector between State Highway 249 and the Sam Houston Tollway and a local transportation advance funding project agreement. According to the agreement, TxDOT will contribute $6,000,000, $15,000,000 and $19,772,235 to fund the direct connector project between Eastbound Beltway 8 and Northbound Hardy Toll Road, the direct connector project between State Highway 249 and the Sam Houston Tollway and the local transportation advance funding project, respectively. As of February 29, 2004, the projects’ percentages of completion were 100%, 75% and 35%, respectively.  Accordingly the Authority has recognized TxDOT’s contribution based on the projects’ percentages of completion.


The Authority has financed the Toll Road Projects with a combination of unlimited tax and subordinate lien revenue bonds, senior lien revenue bonds, and commercial paper.  The proceeds from such bonds, including the interest earned thereon, are being used to finance the construction costs, the related debt service, and a portion of the maintenance and operating expenses.

A.    Long-Term Debt

Changes in the Authority’s Long-Term Debt for fiscal years as shown below were as follows:


B.     Outstanding Bonded Debt – February 29, 2004 – Pertinent Information by Issue


C.    Covenants and Conditions

The Senior Lien Revenue Bonds are payable from operating revenues generated from the Toll Roads.  The Tax Bonds are secured by and payable from a pledge of the County’s unlimited ad valorem taxing power and are also secured by a pledge of and lien on the revenues of the Toll Roads, subordinate to the lien of the Senior Lien Revenue Bonds.  The Authority has covenanted to assess a maintenance tax to pay project expenses if revenues, after paying debt service, are insufficient.  The Authority also has covenanted to collect tolls to produce revenues at the beginning of the third fiscal year following completion of the Toll Roads equal to at least 1.25 times the aggregate debt service on all Senior Lien Revenue Bonds accruing in such fiscal year.  The 1.25 revenue coverage covenant went into effect during fiscal year 1994.  The revenue coverage ratio was 3.74 of February 29, 2004.

D.    Debt Service Requirements

Total interest expense was $90,869,566 for the fiscal year.   The following are the debt service requirements for bonds payable:

E.    Unissued Authorized Bonds

In an election held on September 13, 1983, the voters of the County endorsed using toll roads to alleviate the County’s traffic problems by authorizing the County to issue up to $900,000,000 of bonds secured by a pledged of its unlimited ad valorem taxing power. As of February 29, 2004, the unissued authorized bonds for the toll road project is $17,673,000.

F.     Defeasance of Debt

In the current year and prior years, the Authority has defeased certain bonds by placing the proceeds of the refunding bonds in an irrevocable trust to provide for all future debt service on the refunded bonds.  Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased bonds are not included in the financial statements.  As of February 29, 2004, the outstanding principal balance of these defeased bonds was $1,099,352,000.

G.        Refunding

On July 30, 2003, the County issued $321,500,000 Toll Road Unlimited Tax and Subordinate Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003 to refund all of the County’s outstanding Toll Road Unlimited Tax and Subordinate Lien Revenue Adjustable/Fixed Rate Bonds, Series 1994B-H, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof and to pay certain costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the bonds. In connection with this refunding, the Authority deposited $321,721,962 of proceeds in the irrevocable trust to defease the refunded bond.

The refunding of Toll Road Unlimited Tax and Subordinate Lien Revenue Adjustable/Fixed Rate Bonds, Series 1994B-H resulted in the recognition of an accounting loss of $487,930. This loss is reported in the accompanying financial statements as a deduction from bonds payable and is being amortized through the fiscal year 2021.  No economic gain or loss resulted from the refunding, because the refunded bond had a variable interest rate determined weekly by Bankers Trust Securities Corporation and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and was based upon current yields on short-term tax-exempts obligations. The variable interest rate ranged from 0.90% to 1.45% in fiscal year 2004.

H.    Commercial Paper

In addition to the outstanding long-term debt of the Authority, the Commissioners Court has established a Commercial Paper program secured by and payable from the Trust Estate which includes a gross pledge of Revenues of the Toll Road Project. The Commercial Paper program consists of Harris County Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Notes, Series E in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $150 million outstanding at any one time. As of February 29, 2004, the Authority has $106,270,000 outstanding Commercial Paper.

The purpose of the Series E Notes is to provide funding for costs of acquiring, constructing and improving Toll Road Project components, funding reserves, paying interest during construction and paying costs of issuance.

The Notes will be offered at par only, will mature in not more than 270 days from the date of issue, and will pay par plus interest at maturity. Interest on the Notes is payable on an actual /365-day basis. The interest on the Notes may not exceed the lesser of 10% per annum or the maximum rate allowed by law. A minimum purchase of $100,000 aggregate principal amount and integral multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof is required.

The Notes will have a maximum maturity date of August 15, 2031 and no Series E Note shall (i) mature after the maximum maturity date, (ii) have a term in excess of 270 days, (iii) have a term beyond the third business day prior to the scheduled expiration date for the credit agreement relating to such Series E Note or (iv) be issue at any time that a “no issuance notice” has been issued by the Credit Provider pursuant to the credit agreement which provides that such Series E Note would not be entitled to the security provided by the credit agreement.

The Toll Road entered into a revolving credit agreement dated as of October 1, 2001 with Dexia Credit Local, whereby Dexia has agreed to advance up to $150 million to the Authority to pay the principal of any or all maturing Series E Notes as necessary for a period through October 27, 2004, which is the date of expiration.  The Toll Road anticipates renewal of the credit agreement prior to the expiration date.  For this agreement, the County will be assessed a fee of .125% per annum on the aggregate amount of the commitment. Advances received under the line of credit are payable in full no later than the earlier of 60 days after the date of such advance, unless converted to term loans pursuant to the agreement, or the revolving credit maturity date. The principal amount outstanding for Series E shall be paid three years from the date the term loan is made. Interest is payable monthly during the Term Loan Period at a rate equal to the base rate (which is the higher of (i) the Prime Rate or (ii) the Federal Funds Rate plus one-half of one percent) plus two percent per annum.

The following is a schedule of changes in commercial paper for the year ended February 29, 2004:



Changes in long-term compensated absences for the year ended February 29, 2004 were as follows:




Other payables are comprised of the following:

Customers who use the EZ tag program are assessed a $15 tag deposit fee and a $40 deposit to be used for toll road fees. The customer deposits represent the EZ tag deposits, and deferred revenues represent the customers’ prepaid accounts. Toll charges are deducted from the customers’ prepaid accounts when incurred and as the deposit drops below a specified amount, the Authority automatically charges the customer’s credit card or direct debit the bank account.


Plan Description - The County provides retirement, disability, and death benefits for all of its full-time employees through a nontraditional, defined benefit pension plan in the statewide Texas County and District Retirement System “TCDRS”). The Board of Trustees of TCDRS is responsible for the administration of the statewide agent multiple-employer public employee retirement system consisting of 553 non-traditional defined benefit pension plans. TCDRS in the aggregate issues a comprehensive annual financial report (“CAFR”) on a calendar-year basis. The CAFR is available upon written request from the TCDRS Board of Trustees at P.O. Box 2034, Austin, Texas 78768-2034.

Under the state law governing TCDRS since 1991, the County has had the option of selecting the plan of benefits to provide in the future, while at the same time considering the level of the employer contribution rate required to adequately finance the plan.  Effective January 1, 1995, the County adopted an annually determined contribution rate plan, for which the employer contribution rate is actuarially determined as a part of the annual actuarial valuation.  The rate, applicable for a calendar year, consists of the normal cost contribution rate plus the rate required to amortize the unfunded actuarial liability over the remainder of the plan’s 25-year amortization period which began January 1, 1995 using the entry age actuarial cost method.  Monthly contributions by the employer are based on the covered payroll and the employer contribution rate in effect.  The contribution rate for calendar year 2004 is 10.53%.  The contribution rates for calendar years 2003 and 2002 were 10.31% and 9.86%, respectively.

The plan provisions are adopted by the Commissioners Court of the County, within the options available in the state statutes governing TCDRS (“TCDRS Act”).  Members can retire at ages 60 and above with 8 or more years of service or with 30 years regardless of age or when the sum of their age and years of service equals 75 or more.  Members are vested after eight years but must leave their accumulated contributions in the plan to receive any employer-financed benefit.  Members who withdraw their personal contributions in a lump sum are not entitled to any amounts contributed by the County.

Benefit amounts are determined by the sum of the employee’s contributions to the plan, with interest, and employer-financed monetary credits. The level of these monetary credits is adopted by the Commissioner’s Court of the County within the actuarial constraints imposed by the TCDRS Act so that the resulting benefits can be expected to be adequately financed by the employer’s commitment to contribute. At retirement, death, or disability, the benefit is calculated by converting the sum of the employee’s accumulated contributions and the employer-financed monetary credits to a monthly annuity using annuity purchase rates prescribed by the TCDRS Act.

Funding Policy - The County has elected the annually determine contribution rate (“ACDR”) plan provision of the TCDRS Act. The plan is funded by monthly contributions from both employee members and the County based on the covered payroll of employee members. Under the TCDRS Act, the contribution rate of the County is actuarially determined annually. The County contributed using 10.31% for the months of the accounting year in 2003, and 10.53% for the months of the accounting year in 2004.

The contribution rate payable by the employee members for 2004 and 2003 is the rate of 7% as adopted by Commissioner’s Court. The employee contribution rate and the employer contribution rate may be changed by Commissioner’s Court within the options available in the TCDRS Act.

Annual Pension Cost - For the County’s accounting year ended February 29, 2004, the annual pension cost for the TCDRS plan for its employees, including the Authority, was $56,659,405 and the actual contributions for the Authority were $1,790,194.

The annual required contributions were actuarially determined as a percent of the covered payroll of the participating employees and were in compliance with GASB Statement No. 27 parameters based on the actuarial valuations as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2003, the basis for determining the contribution rates for calendar years 2003 and 2004.  The December 31, 2003 report is the most recent valuation.

Actuarial Valuation Method

Actuarial Valuation Date




Actuarial Cost Method

Entry age

Entry age

Entry age

Amortization Method

Level percentage of payroll, open

Level percentage of payroll, open

Level percentage of payroll, open

Amortization period in years




Asset Valuation Method

Long-term appreciation
with adjustments

Long-term appreciation
with adjustments

Long-term appreciation   with adjustments

Actuarial Assumption:
 Investment return (1)
 Projected salary increases (1)                                   
 Cost of living adjustments

(1) Includes inflation at the stated rate
















Harris County Trend Information

Accounting Year Ended

Annual Pension Cost

Percentage of APC Contributed

Net Pension Obligation














Schedule of Funding Progress

Actuarial Valuation Date




Actuarial Value of Assets




Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL)




Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL)




Funded Ratio




Annual Covered Payroll (Actuarial)




UAAL as Percentage of Covered Payroll






In addition to providing pension benefits described herein, the County provides certain retirement health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees.  The authority under which the provision and obligation to contribute were established is the Commissioner’s Court.  County regulations allow all County employees to become eligible for these benefits after meeting the service and retirement age requirements of the County’s retirement plan.  These requirements, which were modified effective January 1, 1996, require 30 years of service, or 8 years of service and 60 years of age, or years of service plus age equal to 75 or more.  The County pays 100% of the cost of medical and life insurance coverage for retirees.  The Authority recognizes expenses for retirement benefits as paid, which during the fiscal year approximated $102,724.  Presently, 25 retirees qualify for retirement benefits.


Construction Commitments

The Authority is committed under various contracts in connection with the construction of Authority facilities, buildings, and roads of $213,841,515.


Litigation and Claims

The Authority is involved in lawsuits and other claims in the ordinary course of operations.  Although the outcome of such pending lawsuits and other claims are not presently determinable, management of the Authority believes that the resolution of these matters is not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the financial condition of the Authority.

Joint Deposit/Escrow Account

On July 23, 2002, the Commissioners Court approved an agreement for a joint deposit/ escrow account between the Authority and Metro and to deposit $13.8 million in the account. The Authority’s construction and operation of toll road facilities within the Westpark Corridor will necessitate Metro’s incurring architectural and engineering costs in connection with its future development of its public transit projects in the Westpark Corridor over and above the costs it would otherwise incur if no toll road facilities were constructed in the easements acquired by the Authority. The Authority has agreed to escrow funds to be made available to Metro for payment of such future increased costs.



On April 7, 1998, the Commissioners Court approved an interfund loan from the Toll Road Enterprise Fund to the Harris County General Fund in the amount of $13.5 million to finance the payment of the settlement for a judgment against the County.  A promissory note was executed requiring a three-year maturity with principal payable at maturity and an option to extend the note for an additional two years with principal due at the final maturity date.  In April 2001, the note was extended for two additional years. The principal shall bear interest at a variable rate equal to the monthly weighted yield of the Authority’s investment portfolio.  Interest will be based on a 360-day year/simple interest payable on each one-year anniversary date of the note. The $13.5 million was repaid to the Authority in May 2003.

On April 30, 2002, the Commissioners Court approved a $15 million loan to Fort Bend County for the design, engineering, land acquisition and administrative cost related to the Fort Bend Parkway Toll Road project. A tri-party agreement was executed requiring the principal amount and interest on all funds loaned by the Authority to be reimbursed on the earlier (1) 30 days after the issuance of bonds to pay the construction of the Fort Bend Parkway Toll Road if bonds are sold to finance construction of the Fort Bend Parkway Toll Road, (2) two years from the payment date, or (3) 120 days from the date of termination. The $15 million was repaid to the Authority in June 2003.



On April 18, 2001, the Commissioners Court approved a $20 million annual allocation for funding of a County thoroughfare program to enhance the traffic flow to current or proposed toll facilities. This allocation is available for each precinct in the equal amount of $5 million.


On September 9, 2003, the Commissioners Court approved an additional $47.5 million allocation for funding a County thoroughfare program.



On March 11, 2004, the County issued $168,715,000 Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2004A to refund all of the County’s outstanding Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Commercial Paper Notes, Series E, to provide for the capitalized interest on the Bonds, to satisfy the increase in the Debt Service Reserve Fund requirement and to pay costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the bonds.


On May 18, 2004, the County issued $478,270,000 Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2004B-1, B-2 to refund and defease a portion of the County’s outstanding Toll Road Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 1994, to purchase bond insurance policies for the Bonds and to pay cost of issuance and refunding.